1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 390 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Voyager | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3040 mm |