1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1972 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 183 kg more than 1972 Ford Mustang.

Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (385 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (229 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1972 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Grand Voyager Mustang
Year Released 1997 1972
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 5753 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 148 HP 178 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 229 Nm 385 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 88.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 8.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1527 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2780 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]