1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 888 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Grand Voyager | 66 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |