1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2005 Nissan Murano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Murano weights approximately 85 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (229 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2005 Nissan Murano
Make Chrysler Nissan
Model Grand Voyager Murano
Year Released 1997 2005
Body Type Minivan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 246 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 229 Nm 334 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 81 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1795 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2860 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]