1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2490 mm |
