1997 Chrysler Neon vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Neon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 61 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Neon (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Neon | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Neon | 2000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |