1997 Chrysler Phaeton vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 371 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Phaeton | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Phaeton | Elan |
Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 475 HP | 104 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2140 mm |