1997 Chrysler Phaeton vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 380 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Telstar has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Telstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Phaeton | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Phaeton | Telstar |
Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 475 HP | 95 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2520 mm |