1997 Chrysler Phaeton vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Phaeton would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 247 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Phaeton | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Phaeton | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 475 HP | 228 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2710 mm |