1997 Chrysler Phaeton vs. 2008 Ford F-150

To start off, 2008 Ford F-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Phaeton would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 175 more horse power than 2008 Ford F-150. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford F-150.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chrysler Phaeton 2008 Ford F-150
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Phaeton F-150
Year Released 1997 2008
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5400 cc 5409 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 475 HP 300 HP
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5690 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 3520 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]