1997 Chrysler Phaeton vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Phaeton would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 357 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Phaeton | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Phaeton | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 475 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |