1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 335 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Sebring | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
