1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm). This means 1997 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Sebring | 145 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |