1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 421 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 1997 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Sebring | Elan |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 889 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |