1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 160 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (137 Nm). This means 1997 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | 929 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |