1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 1997 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | Puma |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
