1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 202 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (186 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
Model | Sebring | Forester |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |