1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 175 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | Sebring | ZT |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |