1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
