1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 211 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |