1997 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 1997 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Sebring | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Sebring | Clio |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |