1997 Citroen C 15 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1997 Citroen C 15 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1997 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 265 kg more than 1997 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen C 15 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C 15 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1997 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |