1997 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (263 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1997 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1997 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen C 15.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Citroen C 15 2009 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C 15 3
Year Released 1997 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 954 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 44 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 845 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 55 L