1997 Citroen C 15 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen C 15 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen C 15 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | C 15 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 33 L |