1997 Citroen Saxo vs. 1964 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1997 Citroen Saxo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1997 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Citroen Saxo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Saxo. (88 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1964 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Saxo | 1964 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Saxo | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1123 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2060 mm |