1997 Citroen Xantia vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 1997 Citroen Xantia is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Citroen Xantia (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 164.
Because 1977 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Citroen Xantia (267 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Xantia | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xantia | 164 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3350 mm |