1997 Citroen XM vs. 1972 Mazda 616

To start off, 1997 Citroen XM is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Citroen XM (191 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen XM weights approximately 681 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1997 Citroen XM (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Citroen XM 1972 Mazda 616
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM 616
Year Released 1997 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2946 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 191 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 278 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.1 mm 78.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73 mm 83 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1591 kg 910 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2480 mm