1997 Citroen XM vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1997 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen XM weights approximately 440 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen XM. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen XM. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1997 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1997 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen XM | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | XM | FCX |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 273 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |