1997 Citroen XM vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1997 Citroen XM. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 33 kg more than 1997 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen XM | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | XM | CSX |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |