1997 Citroen Xsara vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1997 Citroen Xsara is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 5 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Xsara | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | 220 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |