1997 Citroen Xsara vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 1997 Citroen Xsara is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Citroen Xsara (74 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 40 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1965 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications: