1997 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1997 Citroen Xsara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 85 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (117 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Xsara | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Xsara | Tempo |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |