1997 Citroen Xsara vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Citroen Xsara (55 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 499 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Citroen Xsara (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano. 1997 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 2009 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2009 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Xsara | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | Xsara | Nano |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1099 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |