1997 Citroen Xsara vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (57 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Citroen Xsara | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |