1997 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 500 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daewoo Arcadia | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
| Model | Arcadia | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 1768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4670 mm |
