1997 Daihatsu Feroza vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza (95 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza (130 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (126 Nm). This means 1997 Daihatsu Feroza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Feroza | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Triumph |
| Model | Feroza | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2270 mm |
