1997 Daihatsu Feroza vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (116 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza.
Because 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lotus Elan (146 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza. (130 Nm). This means 1969 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Feroza | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
| Model | Feroza | Elan |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.6 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2440 mm |
