1997 Daihatsu Feroza vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Daihatsu Feroza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Daihatsu Feroza would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza.
Because 1997 Daihatsu Feroza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Feroza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Feroza.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Daihatsu Feroza | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Feroza | 3 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2639 mm |