1997 Daihatsu Gran Move vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Jeep |
| Model | Gran Move | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2700 mm |
