1997 Daihatsu Gran Move vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 645 kg more than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. (171 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Jeep |
| Model | Gran Move | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1800 kg |
