1997 Daihatsu Gran Move vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Daihatsu Gran Move | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Daihatsu | Jeep |
Model | Gran Move | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2790 mm |