1997 Daihatsu Gran Move vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 130 kg more than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. (171 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Daihatsu Gran Move | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
Model | Gran Move | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1285 kg |