1997 Daihatsu Move vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP) has 302 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Daihatsu Move | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Move | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1997 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 345 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2880 mm |