1997 Daihatsu Move vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (88 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Move | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
| Model | Move | EJ |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2680 mm |
