1997 Daihatsu Move vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Ford Zodiac (190 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (88 Nm). This means 1965 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Daihatsu Move | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Move | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2780 mm |
