1997 Daihatsu Move vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Daihatsu Move | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Daihatsu | Sunbeam |
Model | Move | Tiger |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2190 mm |