1997 De Tomaso Guara vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 De Tomaso Guara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 De Tomaso Guara would be higher. At 3,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 De Tomaso Guara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 De Tomaso Guara (282 HP) has 203 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 De Tomaso Guara should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1997 De Tomaso Guara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 De Tomaso Guara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 De Tomaso Guara (402 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1997 De Tomaso Guara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 De Tomaso Guara | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
| Model | Guara | Micra |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3981 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 402 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2449 mm |
