1997 Dodge Avenger vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1997 Dodge Avenger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Dodge Avenger (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 200 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Avenger (180 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Dodge Avenger | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Avenger | 2000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |