1997 Dodge Ram vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1997 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Ram weights approximately 998 kg more than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1997 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Ram (804 Nm) has 614 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (190 Nm). This means 1997 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zodiac. 1997 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1965 Ford Zodiac has manual transmission. 1965 Ford Zodiac will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Dodge Ram | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 804 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2780 mm |
