1997 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1997 Dodge Ram is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1178 kg more than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1997 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Dodge Ram (804 Nm) has 655 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 1997 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. 1997 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1982 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1982 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Dodge Ram | 1982 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 804 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2620 mm |